On 18/06/2019 01:03, Igal Sapir wrote:
> On 6/17/2019 2:18 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Am 17.06.2019 um 18:56 schrieb Mark Thomas:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm starting to look at OCSP stapling for our OpenSSL based connectors
>>> and I suspect a Tomcat Native release will be required. Even if it isn't
>>> for this, it has been a while since the last Tomcat Native release so I
>>> expect we'll need to do one fairly soon anyway.
>>>
>>> The complication is the svn:external that picks up the
>>> org.apache.tomcat.jni package from 9.0.x. Now 9.0.x has moved to git,
>>> this no longer works.
>>>
>>> I looked at a workaround using the "GitHub makes itself look like svn"
>>> but that timed out for the Tomcat repo. I suspect due to size.
>>>
>>> I then looked at Git based solutions. sub-modules and sub-trees look to
>>> be the two options. Of the two, sub-trees looks better:
>>> - it is more suited to "read-only" importing
>>> - it doesn't require any additional commands to populate the imported
>>>    code
>>>
>>> However, using sub-trees means moving Tomcat-Native to git. Before I
>>> start a formal vote to do so, are there any objections?
>>>
>>> The process would be:
>>> - ensure git mirror is up to date
>>> - break the svn->git mirror
>>> - start using git
>>> - update web site etc
>>> - move svn code to archive
>>>
>>> Given how the migration of the main repos went, I'm not expecting any
>>> major issues.
>>
>> +1
> 
> +1

Given there seems to be consensus on doing this, I'm not going to hold a
formal vote. I'll just go ahead and get it done.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to