On 10/05/2019 20:02, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 8:01 PM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> I've just pushed a fix. The tests seem more stable now locally but I am
>> going to keep running them. Thanks for the pointer. The issue was
>> obvious as soon as I read your email.
>>
>> Given the issue has been there for a while, unless anyone objects I am
>> going to go ahead with the releases.
>>
> 
> Excellent. Gitbox seems out of sync again [I hope nobody starts using it,
> or we'll end up running into trouble ...],

Gitbox is currently down so at least nothing can get out of sync.

> so no CI run for now, but I'm
> certain it's the right fix [it works for me locally and I could "reliably"
> reproduce the issue with "test-only" and enough runs of the 5_3 test]. My
> original hack doesn't look so bad retrospectively since it is equivalent to
> waiting for the right notify, but it's a good thing to drop weird hacks.

I still see some failures but they are genuine timeouts due to what
looks like GC pauses. I've disabled debug logging again. That might help.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to