Rainer Jung wrote:
I think it's perfectly valid having to simply use "&" in URLs, no need to encode. On the other hand as long as we don't have a proper decoding for the incoming URLs and I don't know, if all supported web servers decode before putting the query string into our service struct, I would prefer to stick with the original notation (not encoded).
Hmm, we have a strong DTD, and the tidy is complaining about &. Although I agree we can simply use & instead & Not sure what is more valid. Regards, Mladen. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
