On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 9:48 AM Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote:
> Am 2019-04-01 um 09:36 schrieb Rémy Maucherat: > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 7:38 PM Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> Am 2019-03-31 um 14:50 schrieb Konstantin Kolinko: > >>> -1 (veto). > >>> This was discussed several years ago, and the decision was to use > >> "HTTP/2.0" > >>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58605 > >> > >> I tripped over this when comparing access logs between Tomcat and > >> Apache. Also, as you have noted, according to the RFC, it is HTTP/2, not > >> HTTP/2.0. Only the PRI request uses HTTP/2.0 for compat reasons. > >> > >> I don't see a reason to keep an incorrect proto version. Just because > >> Mozilla makes it wrong, it doens't mean we have to. > >> > > > > The commit was vetoed with a reason given, so it should be reverted for > > now, and then discussion may continue on the merits. > > The commit is not part of the master branch. I have intentionally > created a PR. I don't like the CTR approach because it procudes mess in > the first place on the commit log. > > I am happy if we can have that discussion on the mailing list or on the > PR. For now, only Konstantin has objected, I'd like to hear other > comitter's opinion on. > Correct, the branch name is mentioned in the commit message and I missed it, I'm simply not used to it yet. Rémy
