On 23/01/2019 21:55, VP Brand wrote: Sorry. No idea why my mail client picked that senders address. I must have hit the wrong button.
Mark > On 23/01/2019 21:48, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: >> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62912 >> >> --- Comment #14 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> --- >> Created attachment 36389 >> --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36389&action=edit >> Tomcat 9 patch to retain app provided content-type >> >> The application provided content-type is only retained if no charset is >> present. >> > > Thoughts on applying this patch to Tomcat 9? > > Pros: It allows apps to work with both user agents that require spaces > and user agents that require no spaces > > Cons: The switch to passing through the app provided value may break > some user agents and an app change would be required to fix it. > > The risk looks to be very low but so is the scale of the problem this > fixes. One bug report in a little over 8 years suggests this is an issue > for a small minority of users. > > If anything, I am leaning towards applying the patch. Thoughts? > > Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
