https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63078
--- Comment #26 from Remy Maucherat <r...@apache.org> --- (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #24) > First of all I forgot to say thank you to Peter for the thread dump. It was > extremely helpful. > > I'd lean towards increasing the default and minimum utility thread count > from one to two. That should fix this issue and address folks using silly > values like -100 as well. Maybe yes, otherwise and blocking pattern like the one used by the deployer is not allowed. Although in theory it's not a very good pattern. (In reply to Rainer Jung from comment #25) > Wouldn't it be better to limit the queue and log any exception resulting > from the queue being full? Sure, try it ;) (read the scheduled executor javadoc first though) Personally, I like to focus on real problems, and that's not one, so we're fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
