DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37455>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37455 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-27 21:41 ------- Filip, The bottom line is that tcnative-1.dll is misleading. Yes I understand that APR configuration is different than non-APR configuration but it is completely misleading that a non-APR configuration fails simply because tcnative-1.dll exists in the bin directory. I was under the impression (and I suspect many others as well) that so long as APR is disabled in server.xml then it isn't on and the non-APR configuration should work just fine. At the very least Tomcat should note a WARNING that the user specified non-APR SSL configuration but APR is enabled. Can I reopen this issue? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
