https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62615
Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
OS| |All
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> ---
The provided test case is significantly more than the minimum necessary to
reproduce the issue.
"mvn package" fails.
Re-creating the test as a Tomcat unit test does not demonstrate a memory leak.
No evidence (i.e. a reference chain) has been provided to demonstrate that a
memory leak exists.
This is the second report claiming a memory leak where:
- a huge test case has been provided
- 'mvn package' fails
- no evidence of a memory leak can be found
A significant amount of time has been spend investigating these reports that
could have been better spent elsewhere.
Based on this experience, future reports along these lines are likely to be
resolved as invalid without investigation unless the quality of the reports
improves. As a minimum, future reports should be provided as a WAR (with full
source) for the server and a stand-alone Java application (in source form) for
the client. Better still, would be in the form of a patch to the Tomcat unit
tests.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
