On 19/01/18 10:56, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 09:27 +0000, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 18/01/18 21:48, Robert Munteanu wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> (Please keep me in CC, I'm not subscribed to this list)
>>>  
>>> I have developed a Maven plugin to use with Symantec's code
>>> signing.
>>> Currently it is hosted by the Apache Sling project at [1] but
>>> that's
>>> not a proper home for it.
>>>
>>> The code is a blatant copy-paste of the Tomcat Ant task with a
>>> couple
>>> of fixes, so in the future I hope to unify them - but first I'd
>>> like to
>>> find the best location for it for the code.
>>>
>>> I don't think Tomcat is necessarily the best place to host the code
>>> that's potentially useful ASF-wide, but it does not hurt to ask for
>>> opinions :-)
>>
>> I'd agree not here since we wouldn't use the plug-in.
>>
>> Given the code (plug-in and my Ant task) is pretty much done
>> (although
>> I'm sure there is plenty of scope to improve the code I wrote) and
>> there
>> have only been 2 developers I'm not sure a TLP is viable. However, a
>> TLP
>> probably needs to be involved as releases are required.
>>
>> I guess there is some work to extract the common code and provide the
>> Ant task and the Maven plug-in in a single JAR.
>>
>> Hmm.
>>
>> Maven plug-in. Ant task. Written in Java. Used by multiple projects.
>> Mature code. Ideally needs to be released. Primary audience is Apache
>> projects.
>>
>> How about Commons? It isn't a perfect fit but it looks to be the best
>> fit.
> 
> Commons sounds good to me. For the sake of completeness, Brian Demers
> suggested Creadur on users@infra .
This main issue with Creadur is that the code signing would be out of
scope (scope is set by the board resolution that establishes the PMC).

> Commons sounds good to me, just like Creadur. I would slightly incline
> towards Commons, since - as you mentioned - the audience is primarily
> Apache projects, but not exclusively.
> 
> How would this contribution proceeed? One way would be for Tomcat to
> contribute the current implementation and then I could refactor that
> into a reusable component  and submit the Maven plugin as well.

If you aren't already, subscribe to dev@commons.a.o. I'll raise this
there shortly.

Starting with the Tomcat class and then refactoring would work for me.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to