FYI:

The bug was accepted:
https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=JDK-8195096


On 12/01/18 13:28, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/01/18 13:17, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
>> Hi Mark
>>
>> How serious is this issue ?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In terms of functionality, it isn't serious. As far as I can tell, there
> are no functional side-effects for Tomcat.
> 
> However, the more I think about this, the more serious an issue I think
> this will be. A large percentage of Tomcat users operate in environments
> where any logging that even hints that something isn't right has to be
> addressed. A stack trace to stdout would certainly get their attention.
> 
> I think we need a way to suppress this message. Without it a large
> proportional Tomcat users won't be allowed by organisational policy to
> run Tomcat on JDK 10. "Trust us. You can ignore that stack trace, it is
> a known issue with Java 10 that doesn't cause any harm." isn't going to
> be enough for most users.
> 
> My preference remains making that method protected so we can override it
> and make it a NO-OP (Tomcat's custom LogManager handles this already).
> However, I'd settle for anything that enabled that message to be suppressed.
> 
>> It's logged with a low priority, it might have to wait for JDK 11.
> 
> Understood.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
>>
>> Rgds,Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/01/2018 11:39, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the feedback, I'll pass it on.
>>>
>>> Rgds,Rory
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/01/2018 10:20, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>> On 18/12/17 09:56, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip/>
>>>>
>>>>> *Feedback* - If you have suggestions or encounter bugs, please submit
>>>>> them using the usual Java SE bug-reporting channel.
>>>>> Be sure to include complete version information from the output of the
>>>>> |java --version| command.
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I did some testing on this today. I found a problem with our custom
>>>> LogManager triggered by some fixes to the JRE LogManager.
>>>>
>>>> I've created a report via the standard mechanism as requested. The
>>>> internal review ID is 9052225. Anything you can do to get this in front
>>>> of the right folks to ensure it doesn't get overlooked would be
>>>> appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to