On 26/07/2017 15:42, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:37 PM, <r...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Author: remm >> Date: Wed Jul 26 14:37:20 2017 >> New Revision: 1803055 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1803055&view=rev >> Log: >> Fix bit sign checks warnings, no functional change. >> >> To which branches should non functional cleanups like this be backported > now ?
I'd say assess each one on its merits and back-port it as far as you think makes sense. If another committer wants to back-port it further that would be fine too. My personal view (and what I think I'd do by default) is: > 8.5: yes +1 > 8.0: no because of planned EOL ? Probably not. But if there is a possibility of a bug I probably would. > 7.0: yes ? Probably, unless the back-port was complex and the issue cosmetic. > 6.0: no +1 Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
