On 26/06/17 08:12, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 24/06/2017 à 17:25, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> 
>> If 8.5.x was a drop-in replacement would that make a difference?
> 
> Yes that would help.
> 
> 
>> And as a follow-up, what would need to change so 8.5.x was viewed a
>> drop-in replacement?
> 
> The removal of the BIO connectors was the main issue reported. It broke
> tomcatjss [1][2], dogtag [3][4] and jglobus [5].

That is easily fixable. I've already got a patch to fix that I use as
$work that I can pull in.

>> Anything else?
> 
> I can't remember of other issues with the transition to 8.5.

OK, that is pretty good news then.

Assuming we get the BIO issue fixed, might a transition to 8.5.x be
looked at again? If any additional issues come up I'm sure the Tomcat
community would be willing to discuss options for resolving them.

Mark

> 
> Emmanuel Bourg
> 
> 
> [1] https://github.com/dogtagpki/tomcatjss
> [2] https://bugs.debian.org/846677
> [3] http://pki.fedoraproject.org
> [4] https://bugs.debian.org/846714
> [5] https://bugs.debian.org/846723
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to