On 26/06/17 08:12, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 24/06/2017 à 17:25, Mark Thomas a écrit : > >> If 8.5.x was a drop-in replacement would that make a difference? > > Yes that would help. > > >> And as a follow-up, what would need to change so 8.5.x was viewed a >> drop-in replacement? > > The removal of the BIO connectors was the main issue reported. It broke > tomcatjss [1][2], dogtag [3][4] and jglobus [5].
That is easily fixable. I've already got a patch to fix that I use as $work that I can pull in. >> Anything else? > > I can't remember of other issues with the transition to 8.5. OK, that is pretty good news then. Assuming we get the BIO issue fixed, might a transition to 8.5.x be looked at again? If any additional issues come up I'm sure the Tomcat community would be willing to discuss options for resolving them. Mark > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > [1] https://github.com/dogtagpki/tomcatjss > [2] https://bugs.debian.org/846677 > [3] http://pki.fedoraproject.org > [4] https://bugs.debian.org/846714 > [5] https://bugs.debian.org/846723 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org