On 09/06/2017 17:34, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > @Mark: guess you are thinking to server.xml?
Yes. > then it would have placeholder > support so still a system property somehow no? It would have placeholder support (as do all attributes in server.xml) so yes, system properties could be used - with a small edit to server.xml. It would have to be on Server. Mark > > +1 anyway, sounds very useful! > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2017-06-09 18:32 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: > >> On 09/06/2017 16:31, Coty Sutherland wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I was just doing some testing and got had an idea for spinning up new >>> instances of tomcat. JBoss has this system property >>> "-Djboss.socket.binding.port-offset" that I think would be useful for >>> tomcat. As en example, setting the property to 100 on startup would >>> add "100" to all port bindings on the server (e.g. with a vanilla >>> install it would cause tomcat to run on 8105, 8180, and 8109). This >>> prevents uses from having to use a fancy sed (or whatever Windows has) >>> to update the port bindings for every new install. Does anyone else >>> see any value to adding this feature? >> >> I like the idea a lot - apart from the system property part. Would this >> still be as useful if it wasn't a system property? >> >> Mark >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
