https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60844
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Gray <the.daniel.g...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #1) > Thanks for the patch! You're most welcome! :) > Is this not covered by the EL specification? We would prefer not to > re-document behavior which is spec-defined. It probably is, but I haven't read the EL specification. Maybe I should at some point, but I don't know when I'll get around to it. In any case, I think that a lot of developers using Tomcat probably haven't either, and that making the *visible* error communicate a bit more clearly that *neither* the property or method were found, would make _somebody's_ life a tad easier... I do, however, understand that such a seemingly small change may have many other complex implications that I'm not aware of, so I'm just suggesting it as someone more on the "user" side. :) Silver lining though, is that I found this little bugger!! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
