https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60716
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> --- (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #6) > That's a confusing configuration attribute: it implies that revocation is > actually happening instead of just being consulted. Can we get a better name > for that? I re-used the JVM's internal attribute name. My thinking was if it was ever exposed, having the same name would be helpful. I see your point that the name could be better. I don't have any better suggestions though. If you can think of one before the next 9.0.x tag then feel free to change it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
