Hi all,

As you certainly know, OWASP recommends testing HTTP methods of remote servers using nmap "http-methods" script:
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Test_HTTP_Methods_(OTG-CONFIG-006)
One of the recommandations is to ensure TRACE method is disabled (
let's just omit the recommandation on PUT/DELETE in this discussion..)

For this matter, the 'Security Considerations' documentation of Tomcat states [1] the following : "The allowTrace attribute may be used to enable TRACE requests which can be useful for debugging. Due to the way some browsers handle the response from a TRACE request (which exposes the browser to an XSS attack), support for TRACE requests is disabled by default."
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.5-doc/security-howto.html#Connectors

And indeed, with the default configuration, the TRACE method is always refused with the unsupported 405 HTTP status code.

However there is one case where the configuration does not fully apply : response to OPTIONS request for custom servlet (i.e. any non tomcat servlet inherting from HttpServlet). In such case the TRACE methods is incorrectly listed in the Allow header sent back, even though it is correctly handled as not supported when executed.

To reproduce:
1. deploy the attached war (containg all sources) in a tomcat instance listening on port 80 (listing on port 80 is required for proper validation through nmap https-methods script).
2. run the following unix commands :

** Test of custom Servlet :
  $> curl -v -X OPTIONS http://yourIP/test/
  BUG : 200 + Allow GET, HEAD, TRACE, OPTIONS
  Expected : 200 + Allow GET, HEAD, OPTIONS

  $> curl -v -X TRACE http://yourIP/test/
  OK : 405 + Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS

$> nmap -p 80 --script http-methods --script-args http-methods.url-path='/test/' yourIP
  BUG : nmap reports "Potentially risky methods: TRACE"
(even though it is correctly locked down)

This leads several security products which relies on the same test to incorrectly report Tomcat as having a potential security risk, even though there is none.

Technical explanation for this behavior on custom servlet :
- executing the TRACE method is correctly refused by CoyoteAdapter,

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/CoyoteAdapter.java
- but executing the OPTIONS methods is handled by the parent class which DOES NOT apply the connector "allowTrace" configuration and always sends the Allow header listing TRACE method
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/java/javax/servlet/http/HttpServlet.java



To be fully complete on this matter, here is the behavior for JSPs and default servlet :

** Test of JSP :
  $> curl -v -X OPTIONS http://yourIP/test.jsp
  OK : 405 + HTML message indicating "JSPs only permit GET POST or HEAD"
(unrelated to this bug report, an "Allow: GET, POST, HEAD" header would be expected here, there is none. this could be improved while sending "jsp.error.servlet.invalid.method" message, see

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.java )

  $> curl -v -X TRACE http://yourIP/test.jsp
  OK : 405 + Allow: OPTIONS
(unrelated to this bug report, it seems the "Allow" header is incorrrect, "Allow: GET, POST, HEAD" header would be expected here)

nmap -p 80 --script http-methods --script-args http-methods.url-path='/test.jsp' yourIP
  OK

** Test of default servlet :
  $> curl -v -X OPTIONS http://yourIP/index.html
  OK : 200 + Allow: GET, HEAD, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS

  $> curl -v -X TRACE http://yourIP/index.html
  OK : 405 + Allow: HEAD, DELETE, POST, GET, OPTIONS, PUT

$> nmap -p 80 --script http-methods --script-args http-methods.url-path='/index.html' yourIP
  OK (...) : nmap reports "Potentially risky methods: PUT DELETE"
(this is unrelated to this bug report, but there could be some improvement there too)


Regards,
Olivier

@OlivierJaquemet




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to