https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60488
Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> ---
Yes, it is expected that the Connector is non-null.
Looking at the code, we could make the connector field final and requiring it
in the constructor. We might be able to go further and require a non-null
Connector is provided. That would require refactoring a few tests but the
changes to the Tomcat code would be minimal. I'll look at this for trunk
(9.0.x). Whether I actually commit it will depend on what the refactoring ends
up looking like and if there are any side-effects I haven't spotted yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
