2016-02-15 19:47 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: > I tested ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 which is Mozilla's recommended > cipher for 'modern' httpd configurations. > > I saw a 20% improvement with NIO+OpenSSL compared to NIO+JSSE on windows. > > The figures are going to vary with OS, test client, target resource etc. >
Yes, that's most likely the case, it also probably depends on the CPU. My own table was made with: ab -k -Z "XXX" -c 100 -n 1000000 https://127.0.0.1:XXXX/tomcat.gif For the fastest ciphers APR was ahead but not too much compared with NIO+OpenSSL. So there shouldn't be any huge optimization issue. > but it does seem reasonable to say that - in the general case - > NIO+OpenSSL is a better choice than NIO+JSSE. > I guess if you want to try HTTP/2, it probably helps :) > > Thanks all. I think I have enough data to fill in the gaps in my > presentation tomorrow. > > Rémy
