-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rémy,

On 2/5/16 12:54 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2016-02-05 18:28 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
> 
>> Ah. Not sure how I managed to get confused on this. The name
>> makes perfect sense in that case.
>> 
> It must be a bad name for the flag since you got confused by what
> it does, so you can change it.

+1

It took me a minute to remember that the choice was between APR and
NIO, not between OpenSSL and JSSE.

Incidentally... how does one choose NIO+JSSE when APR+OpenSSL (or
NIO+OpenSSL) is available?

> I objected because the proposed name was wrong. Ideas: 
> useAprConnector (not that good, the connector can still be used
> even if the flag is false), aprConnectorAsDefault (maybe, but a
> bit long), defaultToAprConnector (sounds average).

How about connectorForTLS="NIO|NIO2|APR" ?

One can always use "protocol" to be explicit, no?

- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAla1KiMACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCDdgCgw2j8fh4h86V7wl4rQMtUD45g
02oAn1PrtuDhtAkq8PNZz2QRhXSm5p5G
=/zcb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to