https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58565
--- Comment #10 from Remy Maucherat <r...@apache.org> --- IMO a direct "speed" configuration would be quite convoluted and users would have a hard time understanding it. It sounds better to me to keep buffer size and timeout instead. Are there really many who still want to support "large" files and dialup [without retry, since for example wget just happily resumes] ? In that situation, an admin should first increase the timeout, since 20s sounds too short for dialup even if not counting this issue. I'd say 60s in that situation at least, or maybe longer and using a separate shorter keepalive timeout. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
