Rémy,
Thank you.
I reread what I asked about the wiki and I realize it might not have been
clear. Mark said,
*"Long term, we probably do need to migrate the wiki. Short term we
can **use the new instance just for this." *
and I was curious about access, is it already out there and I just don't
know about it, etc... the "new instance."
-Andrew
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Rémy Maucherat <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2015-09-25 17:43 GMT+02:00 Andrew Carr <[email protected]>:
>
> > Mark,
> >
> > Couple of questions. What wiki is the "new" cwiki? Will my wiki account
> > from the old server be transferred to the new cwiki?
> >
> > Devs,
> >
> > I see arguments for and against the protocol upgrade. Based on different
> > opinions, so far, we are inadvertently building a list of options for the
> > future of the AJP protocol, should we consolidate these options and put
> it
> > to a vote? Should I just write the protocol upgrade definition (or let
> it
> > die peacefully as jean-frederic suggested). Something else?
> >
> > You can work on an AJP.next even if some are skeptical, there's no vote
> needed at this stage.
>
> Rémy
>
--
With Regards,
Andrew Carr
e. [email protected]
w. [email protected]
h. 4235255668
c. 4239489852
a. P.O. Box 1231, Greeneville, TN, 37744
