https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58411
Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> ---
However, the Javadoc for Writer references the protected lock object and has
done since Java 1.3 (as far back as I checked). The description is:
The object used to synchronize operations on this stream.
There is a strong implication in that description that all operations are
expected to synchronize on the lock object.
I'm re-opening this while we discuss it further to make sure it doesn't get
forgotten. It might still get resolved as INVALID again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
