Re: [mod_jk] Documentation

[Filip Hanik - Dev Lists]

yes, mod_proxy is probably a better choice, since it is HTTP, if you wanna use mod_jk the end point has to support the AJP protocol, I don't know that any other than jserv and tomcat are doing that right now. Filip David Rees wrote: On 6/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My problem is not a user problem, for the moment I don't want to use mod_jk, I only want to modify it and thus understand the mod_jk code before. So I think my question might be on the right list, but if I am again wrong I excuse myself and I will send this message on the user mailing list. I see, I misunderstood your question, then. I thought you were looking to use mod_jk to load balance JOnAS (does it have a JK connector? I know nothing about it), perhaps mod_proxy would be better suited rather than modifying mod_jk to talk to JOnAS if it doesn't have a JK connector. -Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Filip Hanik