Could you summarise what conflicts and why do we have to use JDT ?
My understanding was that the main reason is that it's better / faster / less leaky than javac - is this correct ? Is it still true for JDK1.5 ? Could we just use javac as default - and in case of 'conflicts' ? Package rename kind of implies additional maintainance of a non-trivial piece of code, merging, etc. Of course - having it as a separate module ( and download ) might be the best solution IMO. Costin On 6/8/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, To avoid any possible conflicts, I see no choice but to package rename the JDT subset that is used by Jasper. Any other ideas ? Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
