DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-02 14:15 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> 
> I have 5.5.12 in production with no problems. And yes, 5.5.13 causes the bug 
> to
> appear for me as well. So, something changed from 5.5.12 -> 5.5.13. Time to 
> look
> at the changelog for 5.5.13.

I didn't see anything in the 5.5.13 changelog (with my untrained eye). However,
this discussion seems to be similar.

http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-Tomcat-5.5.15-Context-Reloading-issue-t1123634.html#a3010048

Rémy?

In that thread Rémy says:

    I added some code to null out certain instances, and your shared log4j
    setup doesn't like it (at least it's a likely possibility). Try to use
    a JNDI based log4j setup (or similar, using one logging namespace for
    all webapps is not clean), or don't share it. 

Would it be possible to see where is the code which nulls out certain 
instances??

The precursor the above thread is at:
http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-5.5.15-Context-Reloading-issue-t1076386.html#a2955863

Be aware that in comment 4 and comment 6, both Christophe and I have reported
that even with nothing in common/lib (no log4j.jar, no commons-logging.jar), we
still get the bug. The only log4j.jar and commons-logging.jar is the one present
in WEB-INF/lib of the webapp. So, more than likely the "shared log4j" setup is
not the culprit.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to