Bill Barker wrote:
Since having a common base is not likely - I'm using same
approach as apr, i.e. separate connector,
duplicate some code ( but this may allow better cleanup )
Is there anything wrong with the stuff I did in the main branch ? I
would like to remove things like PoolTcpEndpoint, its friend
the thread
pool, ThreadPoolRunnable (thread locals work well; also,
since it's the
protocol handler that is selecting the processor, it allows
tricks like
what I did to support comet), and move to executors.
I take it you're planning to get rid of the o.a.jk AJP Connector? It still
uses ThreadPool (although it wouldn't be hard to change it :).
No, I don't plan to remove it, but I don't plan to use it either.
Rémy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
