Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hola, For starters, I don't think the article is total FUD. It's may be outdated, and like I said progress has been made by multiple parties involved (Tomcat with JULI, commons-logging with its implementation, log4j 1.3 in some relevant areas, SLF4j and other external projects, etc). But that's besides the point.
Ok, this particular one is not 100% FUD, it's merely hugely inflating issues which may occur when log4j is used and is deployed in certain ways, and which can also be caused by bugs in Tomcat's logging usage (getting a logger without the proper classloader being bound, etc). In the end, having a more robust logging implementation would most likely also avoid problems.
Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
