Hi people, Pedro,

This is both a sad & funny true story. 

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39594

> We were trying to make our servlets use relative  path so that our deplayment 
> would 
> be faster. In the  process we try putting $Catalina_home in the path for the 
> base doc
> [etc]

> After this we noticed a folder called $CATALINA_HOME in the root dir for 
> tomacat, we 
> never created such a  dir so we whent ahead and deleted it. For our surprise, 
> that 
> folder was linked to the root folder for tomcat  and deleted everything. 

---

As I said, this was both humorous and tragic. Humorous because Tomcat and it's 
folders thoughtfully nuked Pedro's root - I can just see the expression on his 
face and mouth hanging slightly open. Gotcha!

Tragic, because Remy is going to mark this issue as 'RESOLVED WILL-NOT-FIX'. 
No, Pedro, this is intended behaviour. It's better than the Deployer in 5.0 
because I wrote it. Anyone can write a different deployer implementation. If 
you don't like it, you can use a different platform. Anyone can use a different 
platform. Have a nice day.

??? what ??!

---

Sorry about the humour Pedro -- I've had similar happen to me and can only 
laugh because I know what a ghastly suprise this is.

What really makes this funny, is that all this amusement comes from Remy 
rewriting the Context/ Deployer implementation in 5.5 and coming over all 
defensive about its defects... marking all reported issues in this area as 
RESOLVED (they're not) WILL-NOT-FIX (he won't).  Well, at least the second part 
is true.


Go on, prove me right.


Cheers,
Thomas

PS:  Full and absolute good faith - any pointed comments have come *after* 
seeing defects & bug reports from others systematically being ignored & blown 
off.  If people come to me with a problem in my code, I fix it first, ask about 
future/ related requirements, check against design cases and stub these for 
future coverage... sometimes 2 - 5 years ahead.  Sure beats telling people to 
f** off.

Reply via email to