DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39508>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39508 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-07 22:20 ------- RFC 1945 (which is where I assume the quote is coming from) is informational only. AFAIK, there isn't any official HTTP/1.0 standard, and RFC 2616 (the HTTP/1.1 spec) is the closest you're going to get. Tomcat's behavior is correct wrt RFC 2616. The only way that Tomcat could possibly determine that a Request body was sent is to peek at the input. This would slow down request processing to an unacceptable level. And, since Tomcat's behavior here is identical to Httpd's (so, in particular, the AJP/1.3 Connector would alway do this :), this seems to be a reasonable way to deal with broken HTTP/1.0 clients. The Servlet is always free to send back a 400 Response code if it doesn't get what it is looking for. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
