DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37302>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37302 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-20 07:46 ------- We too had this problem and I spent a few days trying to figure it out. We have one project using 5.5.9 and it worked fine. So we used their same environment but with Tomcat 5.5.16 and was having problems. I ended up downloading all the tomcat versions from 5.5.9 to 5.5.17 to find out what was causing the problem. When going form 5.5.x to 5.5.y, one would expect minor changes and bug fixes only. Perhaps it's just a confusion about the versioning system, but I believe such a minor increment should not have regression issues. I vote to add the rule back, and to make the change for the next major version, 5.6 or 6.0 or whatever. I could understand if the rule was removed because it was causing problems, but to remove it simply because it was thought to be useless is a bit careless, especially now with evidence to the contrary. -Michael -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]