DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37509>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37509 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-14 21:05 ------- The current behavior does not follow the file properties specification see http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/Properties.html#load(java.io.InputStream) but claims it does. in org.apache.juli.ClassLoaderLogManager ... /** * Get the value of the specified property in the classloader local * configuration. * * @param name The property name */ public String getProperty(String name) { ... This requires a correction either in the documentation, to explain the specific behavior, or in the code to follow file properties specification. I fully agree that this is neither critical nor urgent. Priority or resource might impose to postpone the fix. Or compatibility with the buggy behavior might be preferred to a code fix. That's no trouble, but transition to "Resolved won't fix" when the specification contract is broken cannot be a good practice. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]