DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37509>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37509


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-14 21:05 -------
The current behavior does not follow the file properties specification see
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/Properties.html#load(java.io.InputStream)

but claims it does.

in org.apache.juli.ClassLoaderLogManager 
...
    /**
     * Get the value of the specified property in the classloader local
     * configuration.
     * 
     * @param name The property name
     */    
    public String getProperty(String name) {
...

This requires a correction either in the documentation, to explain the specific
behavior, or in the code to follow file properties specification.

I fully agree that this is neither critical nor urgent. Priority or resource
might impose to postpone the fix. Or compatibility with the buggy behavior might
be preferred to a code fix. That's no trouble, but transition to "Resolved won't
fix" when the specification contract is broken cannot be a good practice.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to