DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37439>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37439 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-13 20:30 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Note in the docs? This has to be a bug, no? > > Should a connector of a service be able to access a host in another > > service? > If > > yes, this is insane, if not you've got a bug. > > Well, I guess it's insane then ;-). > > Multiple <Service /> tags is deprecated. However, if you don't name your > Engines the same name, then the mapping should work as you expect it to. So are you saying that Engines across different services end up merged or visible to each other if they have the same name? If so I'd put that in the manual. I only ask because it causes a bit of a security problem. If you connect via Apache-httpd and think you can rely on a connector/engine either matching a host defined inside it, or defaulting to the default host inside it, you get a nasty shock if it happens to find a match on a totally different application somewhere else, especially if you thought that application was secured. :( Thanks for the prompt reply. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
