Henri Gomez wrote:
These proposals all look interesting. The problem is that there are
lots of proposals and this would seem to inevitably take quite some time
to stabilize all of this in mod_jk, mod_proxy_ajp, and Tomcat (native
and Java). I'd love to be proven wrong, though.
Not necessary, if you take a look at curent jk/ajp implementations
(native and java), there is allready code in it for AJP14 support :)
Including the ability to increase the packet size (or specifically to
use a larger packet if necessary to capture all the headers)?
How stable is AJP13 functionality in this code? I currently only need
this one additional feature :-)
--
Jess Holle
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
