you can use a stupid one here too. just make sure it is sticky.
Tino Schwarze wrote:
Hi Filip,
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:44:21AM -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I wrote together a little idea (also emailed to geronimo-dev for
feedback) on how the next generation of session replication should be done.
Today's replication is an all-to-all replication, and within that realm,
its pretty poor. It creates way to much network traffic as each request
results in X number of network transmits (where X is the number of nodes
in the cluster/domain).
[...]
The drawback of your approach is that you still need an intelligent
loadbalancer in front of the cluster. When using all-to-all replication
you can use a stupid one, which simply schedules requests round-robin.
Bye,
Tino.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
