Costin Manolache wrote:
Re. source folders versus modules - we can have both of them, it's not
exclusive.
Single source tree makes it easy to navigate, more IDE-friendly, etc.
The build file can compile as many modules as needed - either by compiling a
subset of the tree, or by compiling the entire tree and generating
several modules.
...
Having a single source tree would also greatly simplify the ant file,
and with eclipse
it can completely skip the compilation task ( i.e. if the ant file
uses the same build/classes
dir as eclipse, it'll detect the already-compiled classes and just
create the jars, while
eclipse can keep the source updated on save ).
I agree - single top-level directory, everything in place under that,
much easier to build with an IDE, and the benefit Costin mentioned
about saving compile time (since Eclipse by default saves a .class
when you save (and for each imported) .java file...
Ian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]