DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38806>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38806 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-28 13:18 ------- Right, it makes sense to retry the disabled worker also. Try by changing the #define JK_WORKER_IN_ERROR(w) ((w)->in_error_state && !(w)->is_disabled && !(w)->is_busy) to: #define JK_WORKER_IN_ERROR(w) ((w)->in_error_state && !(w)->is_busy) Your patch only addresses the byreq lb methods, while the others should be treated in the same way. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
