DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38740>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38740 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-22 16:44 ------- Believe me, I feel with you. But round robin on each request is not very efficient, nor is the SimpleTcpReplicationManager. You will get far more juice out of the DeltaManager. In order to have round robin, you should add the (waitForAck="true") to your <Sender> element, this guarantees that the session is replicated before the response is returned to the client. I BELIEVE THE WAITFORACK COULD SOLVE YOUR PROBLEM FOR TRUE ROUND ROBIN REPLICATION. mod_jk has never been a big favorite of mine, I always use mod_proxy, and we pair one apache with one tomcat, we always do the load balancing before we hit apache. The reason the bug is invalid, is cause its a simple documentation issue. If your replication doesn't work due to the mod_jk implementation, then this bug is still invalid, and you should open up one against that module. I have tested your scenario and have found nothing wrong nor have I been able to reproduce the error under any circumstances. I would say you received quite good support for all the $0 dollars you spent and not reading the manual ;) Let us know if we can help with anything else -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
