I really try to avoid these threads cause I'm not interested in debates
nor the political aspects of open source projects and how they work,
but the user brings up a good point, with a probable solution, and I
don't see how a non committer response like the one below is even justified.
I'm not intending to start a flame war here, just asking for a little
bit more courtesy.
Think about it, what would the tomcat project be without its users?
Filip
George Sexton wrote:
RESOLVED | INVALID
George Sexton
MH Software, Inc.
http://www.mhsoftware.com/
Voice: 303 438 9585
-----Original Message-----
From: Reinhard Moosauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 11:09 AM
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: never say never...
Hi List,
please somebody explain:
every few days, a strange procedure can be seen on this list.
Somebody asks for improvement, suggests a fix or simply wants
to discuss a new
feature.
Few minutes later, there is an answer from somebody, which
tells us to ignore
this subject, because it is not relevant.
Is this necessary? Ok, sometimes we are too simple-hearted to
understand all
consequences of our suggestions.
But IMHO, a one-line-answer is not going to help.
Please, replace your "go away", with "I vote against it".
(Even better would be some keywords for the green, so we can
find some more
wisdom.)
R.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
