Thanks for your reply, I must be subscribed there by mistake... It would be great if I was unsubscribed. Thanks, Marc
----- Original Message ---- From: Roland Turner (Apache) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Marc de Klerk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 9:25:15 PM Subject: Re: Persistent storage of sessions, why no Principal? Hi Marc, On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 10:05 -0800, Marc de Klerk wrote: > is this spam or can you guys take me out of the mailing list? I'm puzzled by your reply. - Are you unaware that you're subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Given that it averages ~20 messages a day, I assume that you cannot possibly be unaware of your subscription to it.) or - Do you feel that questions about the innards of Tomcat's source code are out of place on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Something else? - Raz > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Roland Turner (Apache) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: dev@tomcat.apache.org > Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 6:41:56 PM > Subject: Persistent storage of sessions, why no Principal? > > I note that StandardSession has notes on the authType and principal > indicating that they are not included in the serialised form of the > object, but no explanation of this choice is obvious. I also have the > impression that there's some see-sawing on this; the limitation is > present in 4.1.31 and 5.0.30, but some Googling shows this up in the > 5.0.20 changelog: > > Avoid serializing Subject/Principal when persisting the session > (jfarcand) > > Can someone explain why (or point me at an existing explanation that > I've missed)? > > Thanks. > > - Raz > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >
