DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38532>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38532 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 01:50 ------- The answer is that 304 responses should not contain a Content-Type, according to RFC 2616 section 10.3.5: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.5 If the conditional GET used a strong cache validator (see section 13.3.3), the response SHOULD NOT include other entity-headers. Otherwise (i.e., the conditional GET used a weak validator), the response MUST NOT include other entity-headers; this prevents inconsistencies between cached entity-bodies and updated headers. MSIE does not "go crazy" when receiving a 304 response, so my guess is that the 304 has nothing to do with the observed problems. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]