DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36155>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36155 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 17:51 ------- The comment by Dan sounded much like "your config cannot work at all". So i think i need to explain a little more: The config does work, if you: - restart apache, then run only "./test.sh alias1": you will only see host1 on the console - restart apache, then run only "./test.sh alias2": you will only see host2 on the console - use worker1 for the one virtualhost, and use worker2 for the other, then run "./test.sh alias1" and "./test.sh alias2" in parallel: both scripts return the right results. I hope that you agree with me, that tomcat chooses the hosts like it should. Note, that the server.xml says useIPVHosts="true" - so tomcat does AFAIK not look at the host-header, but at some other information that mod_jk sends. Since i also use "UseCanonicalName On" for apache, mod_jk is supposed to send the ServerName declared for the virtualhost. The config does not work, if you use the same worker for both virtualhosts - which is "the right thing" IMHO since there is also only one tomcat running. What do i mean, with "it does not work" - well: Start "./test.sh alias1" and "./test.sh alias2" in parallel. If you're lucky, it works for 10 requests and you see what you should: "host1" returned by the first command, and "host2" returned by the second command. The result changes for me, and the at least one command "goes crazy" and returns something else: either the command only returns host1 instead of host2 (or vice versa of course) or sometimes i even get an alternating sequence of host1 and host2 by one of the commands - or even by both. Especially the alternating output is a case, that should not occur. The choice made by tomcat is deterministic AFAIK and tomcat is only considering the data that it gets by mod_jk, so how can there be an alternating sequence? My conclusion is, that mod_jk sends the wrong servername, or perhaps sending the servername is optional and tomcat just "reuses" the information it has been given by a former AJP-request on the same connection - but i have no clue about those internal things. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
