Yoav Shapira wrote:
If they explain their desired functionality exactly, we can certainly discuss it further. I still wouldn't call it a bug because it's functioning as designed for 5.5 (as noted previously, this is slightly different from 5.0).
The point was to remove redundant information to make the deployer reasonably robust. People can develop a new deployer (and associated manager webapp) with more capabilities if they want to, but I am -1 for touching the behavior of the current one in this area, since it will cause it to revert to broken 5.0.x behavior.
Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
