I'm a bit puzzled - can you explain a bit why you think it's a bad idea ???

I hope you realize this is not 'prefork' mode ( i.e. forking a tomcat
on each request ), just wait
for the first connection and pass the server socket descriptor. It's
by far the cleanest method to run tomcat on port 80 - either via
xinetd/launchd, or via another native wrapper ( compare it with
commons-daemon ). And the only clean method I know of loading tomcat
on demand - instead of keeping it running and taking memory all the
time. Tomcat is not used only for big servers, but also for
development and smaller servers - I don't like my memory used by code
that I run only once in a while.

Costin

On 11/24/05, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Author: costin
> > Date: Wed Nov 23 21:34:19 2005
> > New Revision: 348665
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=348665&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Another experiment - this class uses NIO to get the socket from Xinetd (
> > I'll also try
> > with launchd ). This allows starting tomcat on-demand, from xinetd/lauchd.
> > Work in progress, I also want to shutdown when idle for too long.
> >
> > This is also targeted to embeded/desktop use.
> >
>
> About the most useless waste of svn space I could imagine.  I mean, it's
> like a total reason to close off the sandbox right here.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to