What problems ? I think it would be cleaner and more consistent with what we do - i.e. label/branch all components at the same time and same way.
Well, maybe 6.x would be the right time to reorg the code to a single tree, I'll ask again when we get there ( BTW - what are the plans for 6.x ? ) Costin On 11/22/05, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: > > Well, can't stop myself: > > > > The right solution is to stop playing SVN tricks, and just reorganize > > the code as a single > > codebase instead of 4 (or 5). So my question remains: can we _move_ > > build, connectors, etc as > > subdirs in a single svn tree, while preserving some file history ? > > We could do this but I see this creating more problems when we reach a > point where we want to start on 6.x than it will solve for us now. > > Mark > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
