[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15268777#comment-15268777
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-946:
------------------------------------------
Github user okram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/299#issuecomment-216542972
You don't need it in `ComputerResultStep` either as that is a simple
`AbstractStep` and thus, gets the "interrupt check" from `next()/hasNext()` of
`AbstractStep`.
VOTE +1. -- very cool we finally have this. Also, super glad its not some
insane reengineering of all the steps.
> Traversal respecting Thread.interrupt()
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-946
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-946
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: process
> Affects Versions: 3.0.2-incubating
> Reporter: stephen mallette
> Assignee: stephen mallette
> Fix For: 3.2.1
>
>
> This issue was discussed to some degree here:
> https://pony-poc.apache.org/thread.html/e6477fc9c58d37a5bdcb5938a0eaa285456ad15aa39e16446290e2ff@1444993523@%3Cdev.tinkerpop.apache.org%3E
> There's a good half-way solution in all this that balances performance with
> the desired capability.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
