[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15212682#comment-15212682
]
Bob Briody commented on TINKERPOP-1078:
---------------------------------------
Fair enough. Not really following this comment then:
{quote} I believe (moving forward too) that explain() and profile() should have
the same steps in them. {quote}
Regardless, I stick by what I said about profile step. It's a diagnostic tool,
not a regular traversal step (from the user's perspective).
> Do not include TraversalMetrics cap in profile results.
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1078
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: process
> Affects Versions: 3.1.1-incubating
> Reporter: Bob Briody
> Labels: breaking
> Fix For: 3.2.0-incubating
>
>
> _As a user profiling a traversal, I am likely to cap the TraversalMetrics
> results, but I don't actually want that Step included in my profile._
> When the TraversalMetrics are cap'd off the end of the traversal the .cap()
> Step should be excluded from the metrics and timers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)