[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15118151#comment-15118151
]
Jason Plurad commented on TINKERPOP-964:
----------------------------------------
I used a 3 node configuration and ran through the examples from the TinkerPop
documentation. I didn't do any scale testing, so largest data set was Grateful
Dead.
I have some notes/documentation written up on the Apache Ambari setup I've been
using. I captured a lot of the stumbling blocks in there. Should I get these
incorporated into the documentation?
https://github.com/pluradj/ambari-vagrant/tree/tp3/ubuntu14.4/tp3
Some of the configuration overlaps with this PR in progress
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/170
> Test XXXGraphComputer on a Hadoop2 cluster (non-pseudocluster).
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-964
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-964
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: hadoop, test-suite
> Affects Versions: 3.1.0-incubating
> Reporter: Marko A. Rodriguez
> Assignee: Jason Plurad
> Fix For: 3.1.1-incubating
>
>
> Seems that [~drobin1437] was having troubles with {{GiraphGraphComputer}} on
> his Hadoop2 cluster, where (crazy enough) it works fine on his Hadoop2
> pseudo-cluster. As such, I think we should test both {{SparkGraphComputer}}
> and {{GiraphGraphComputer}} on real clusters. Moreover, it would be great to
> test with the 1-billion edge Friendster graph. We had done this before in the
> {{MX}}-days, but we should make it part of our testing process (even if its
> manual). Perhaps using AWS to spin up a cluster "easily."
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
