+1 here too, there's been a lot of back and forth involving many people,
and it's been a long time coming. I'd love to see this through.

I'd like to see +1s from more committers

On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 12:01 PM Ville Brofeldt <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Very valuable feature, +1 from me, too.
>
> Ville
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019, 20:32 Tresdon Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I want to gather some sentiment around this PR which allows users to
> > communicate whether their dashboards are for general consumption or for
> > their own purposes (work to be done before general consumption, esoteric
> > dashboards / charts, or "this is a test" type dashboards). It aims to
> > declutter the main area for listing dashboards by filtering on this
> status.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/pull/4725
> >
> >
> > This PR will introduce a few changes to different parts of the
> application:
> >
> > DB changes:
> >
> >    1. A DB migration will add the boolean field "published" to the
> >    dashboards table in superset.db. It will set all dashboards to
> > published on
> >    migration so that all dashboards remain visible.
> >
> > UI changes:
> >
> >    1. On listing dashboards through the "dashboards" link at the top of
> the
> >    application there will be a new sortable column called "published".
> >    2. Dashboards will have a badge at the top of them next to the favstar
> >    communicating the status of it (Draft or Published) *unless* the
> >    dashboard is already published and the viewing user has no permissions
> > to
> >    change it.
> >    3. The aforementioned badge can be clicked to toggle the status of the
> >    dashboard or it can be edited through the dashboard CRUD view.
> >
> >
> >
> > I would very much appreciate a response of +1 if this would be a useful
> and
> > welcome feature in your environment and a -1 with grievances if there are
> > objections regarding – this would provide exigency for putting a feature
> > flag in front of this functionality. Many thanks in advance for your
> > participation!
> >
> > Best always,
> > Tresdon
> >
>

Reply via email to