On 2018/01/09 15:49, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
2018-01-09 3:22 GMT+01:00 k.suzaki <[email protected]>:
Dear,
I found some dlopen() functions in the stali source code. I guess they are
obstacle of static linking.
However, the configure files and .m4 files have the open "enable_dlopen=no".
Are all dlopen() functions suppressed when the source files are compiled as
static linking?
# If so, it is a good job.
http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2012/12/08/4
I read the article "static linking and dlopen". There are many following
threads discussing static linking and dlopen.
However, I cannot understand the solution for stali.
I found the useful thread which describes the dlopen in musl clearly.
http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2012/12/09/7
musl includes a dlopen function.
When a binary is statically linked, it is a stub.
When a binary is dynamically linked, it loads the shared library
requested.
Does a static linked binary in stali have a stub?
Does the binary is suppressed by "enable_dlopen=no" at configure level?
Or both?
-------
suzaki
Best regards,
Daniel
-----
suzaki
.
