Interesting mix of top- and bottom-posting. I'll not disturb it. Anyway, 1999 was 14 years ago. I think uint64_t is the least of our worries if we're porting to some exotic architecture where gcc can't at least emulate a 64-bit integer. I mean even tcc has a runtime library for that.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 01:10:37PM -0500, Galos, David wrote: > Right, but '-ansi -pedantic' is strictly C89. GCC doesn't complain, > but I could imagine there being trepidation around using a C99 header > in a C89 environment (where it is not required). > > 2013/6/11 Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de>: > > Galos, David dixit: > > > >>On GNU systems stdint.h still provides uint64_t, but I have no idea > >>how portable this is. > > > > <stdint.h> is C99. > > > > bye, > > //mirabilos > > -- > > 17:08⎜«Vutral» früher gabs keine packenden smartphones und so > > 17:08⎜«Vutral» heute gibts frauen die sind facebooksüchtig > > 17:10⎜«Vutral» aber auch traurig; früher warst du als nerd voll am arsch > > 17:10⎜«Vutral» heute bist du als nerd der einzige der wirklich damit > > klarkommt > > >
